Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://www.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=131750 |
Page 5 of 7 |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Even the Princess Caitlin sycophants at ESPN are lambasting the refs for their abysmal, game-deciding call. |
Author: | Sock Puppet [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
SVP is really upset about it. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Nobody watched women’s college basketball but now everyone is bitching about it. |
Author: | conns7901 [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Good teams win, great teams cover. UConn +3.5 for the W! |
Author: | Beardown [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
And yeah. That ref fixed it. HUGE MONEY is at stake. They might get 15 million plus watching the championship game. Sunday night. Best TV day of the week. Probably less then 5 million watching if Clark isn't in it. So that's 3 times the ad money. They should give that ref a couple hundred grand. They probably will. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Hawg Ass wrote: Nobody watched women’s college basketball but now everyone is bitching about it. That call was so bad you'd think Iowa was the Green Bay Packers. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
conns7901 wrote: Good teams win, great teams cover. UConn +3.5 for the W! |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Tall Midget wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Nobody watched women’s college basketball but now everyone is bitching about it. That call was so bad you'd think Iowa was the Green Bay Packers. And here I thought you were better than dolphin and Frank. |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Tall Midget wrote: Even the Princess Caitlin sycophants at ESPN are lambasting the refs for their abysmal, game-deciding call. First of all I can’t believe you made me watch 30 seconds of a women’s basketball game. Secondly, it was an offensive foul. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Tall Midget wrote: Even the Princess Caitlin sycophants at ESPN are lambasting the refs for their abysmal, game-deciding call. First of all I can’t believe you made me watch 30 seconds of a women’s basketball game. Secondly, it was an offensive foul. Thank you for once again checking in from the alternate reality known as PACKERLAND. |
Author: | Jaw Breaker [ Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Tall Midget wrote: Even the Princess Caitlin sycophants at ESPN are lambasting the refs for their abysmal, game-deciding call. There was also an earlier foul called against KK where there was no contact. Zero. |
Author: | Phil Leotardo [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
conns7901 wrote: Good teams win, great teams cover. UConn +3.5 for the W! Tell us your bets before the game, not after. Otherwise you are a fraud. |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Good to see the refs made up for missing an offensive call on one end by calling a clear offensive foul on the other. Need to learn from mistakes and these refs knew that two wrongs don’t make a right. |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
it wasnt a bad call |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
iT wAsNt a fOuL !!! |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
They call that in the NBA every single game. |
Author: | Nardi [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 6:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
I don't know how more obvious it can get |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Everyone on x is saying the Iowa girl sold the foul. I don't see that at all. She was illegally blocked, and it immediately pissed her off. Rightfully so. |
Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Yes, under the rules of basketball that was a moving pick. But when did we start calling the game by the rules? There's carrying almost every time down the floor. Clark herself pushes off constantly to make space with no call. And here's my real problem with the call at that point in the game. If there's no call and Bueckers hits a shot to win the game, I don't think anyone is complaining that the no call on that pick made the difference. The defender got hung up for a split second. Let Bueckers try to win the game. Instead they handed the game to Iowa. Which, of course, is what everyone with a financial interest wanted. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
It didn't look like a foul in real time, but it certainly looks like one in slow motion. I don't think that call typically gets made at the end of tight games, though. And I don't think it was getting called earlier in the game. But since all of the CFMB Princess Caitlin Sycophants are breaking down plays, maybe you can explain this foul call to me: |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Real time…definitely a foul and not particularly close. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Yes, under the rules of basketball that was a moving pick. But when did we start calling the game by the rules? There's carrying almost every time down the floor. Clark herself pushes off constantly to make space with no call. And here's my real problem with the call at that point in the game. If there's no call and Bueckers hits a shot to win the game, I don't think anyone is complaining that the no call on that pick made the difference. The defender got hung up for a split second. Let Bueckers try to win the game. Instead they handed the game to Iowa. Which, of course, is what everyone with a financial interest wanted. Of course people would be complaining about that no call had it happened . People still complain about the Hue Hollins game , Reggie Miller, pushing off on Jordan, Jordan pushing off on Bryon Russell. |
Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
It doesn't look nearly so bad from this angle: You have to give Marshall credit for flying backward like she was shot by a cannon. |
Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
badrogue17 wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Yes, under the rules of basketball that was a moving pick. But when did we start calling the game by the rules? There's carrying almost every time down the floor. Clark herself pushes off constantly to make space with no call. And here's my real problem with the call at that point in the game. If there's no call and Bueckers hits a shot to win the game, I don't think anyone is complaining that the no call on that pick made the difference. The defender got hung up for a split second. Let Bueckers try to win the game. Instead they handed the game to Iowa. Which, of course, is what everyone with a financial interest wanted. Of course people would be complaining about that no call had it happened . People still complain about the Hue Hollins game , Reggie Miller, pushing off on Jordan, Jordan pushing off on Bryon Russell. I disagree. All of those were way worse than that play. That was a dicey call to make- period. Sure, when we watch a replay and slow it down, it was a foul. I'm not arguing that it wasn't. But at game speed, it was a very minor thing. Iowa players, especially Clark, have a habit of getting touched and then flying sideways as if they were hit by a baseball bat. If it were LeBron doing it you'd be ridiculing him. Clark won't even stop flopping after the game is over: |
Author: | Nardi [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: It doesn't look nearly so bad from this angle: You have to give Marshall credit for flying backward like she was shot by a cannon. Because that angle sucks |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Tall Midget wrote: It didn't look like a foul in real time, but it certainly looks like one in slow motion. |
Author: | KDdidit [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
It's a no doubter foul. It'd be a foul in the NBA too because the person screened would flop into the front row. |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
No call on Clark barreling into the girl on the go ahead shot…that’s one to complain about. |
Author: | KDdidit [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Women's sports have truly arrived. I'll see you all at the Sky and Red Star games. |
Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Clark 5 Million offer from Big3 |
Nardi wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: It doesn't look nearly so bad from this angle: You have to give Marshall credit for flying backward like she was shot by a cannon. Because that angle sucks Yeah, if you're a Caitlin Clark fanboy. |
Page 5 of 7 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |