Are you talking about when LoTT reported that some hospital was doing some procedure and the hospital claimed they received a bomb threat?

If so, I think you need another crash course in what "doxxing" is and isn't. "Doxxing" is posting personally identifiable information, which while technically "publicly available", isn't necessarily readily available or known. "Doxxing" is not saying the name of a well-known entity like a hospital. Saying "McDonald's chicken isn't really chicken" isn't "doxxing" McDonald's.

Criticize LoTT for their journalistic acumen, and there's plenty of meat on that bone for sure, but stating, even incorrectly, that "Boston Children's Hospital is offering this procedure to minors" isn't "doxxing" anyone or anything.

I'll ask again. What was bernstein's intent in threatening to "expose" this guy? What did dan think- or hope- would happen if he did? Something that would make Messenger happy? Something that would help his kids were dan to "involve" them?

“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”

I'll ask again. What was bernstein's intent in threatening to "expose" this guy? What did dan think- or hope- would happen if he did? Something that would make Messenger happy? Something that would help his kids were dan to "involve" them?

The answer to all of these things ultimately end up as "stupid internet argument". I'm going to share your public info because you already share it all on social media and tag your kids who probably already know that their dad is one of those people online.

People don't like Bernstein. They've rooted for him to be fired a few times. If Jason Bennetti had done this no one would care.

The point is, bernstein has a long history of acting as if such "stupid internet arguments" are real and credible threats against him and his family.

So now that he is the one making the "stupid internet argument"/threat I'm not going to lose any sleep if it gets treated as if it were a real credible threat and bernstein suffers consequences.

The answer to all of these things ultimately end up as "stupid internet argument". I'm going to share your public info because you already share it all on social media and tag your kids who probably already know that their dad is one of those people online.

People don't like Bernstein. They've rooted for him to be fired a few times. If Jason Bennetti had done this no one would care.

It's not really that you and I are in disagreement here.

When IMU told you to "Die in a fire", I know you didn't think he was threatening to burn your house down.

The point is, bernstein has a long history of acting as if such "stupid internet arguments" are real and credible threats against him and his family.

So now that he is the one making the "stupid internet argument"/threat I'm not going to lose any sleep if it gets treated as if it were a real credible threat and bernstein suffers consequences.

It really can't be any simpler than this. Bernsie more or less created ALERT THE AUTHORITIES and calling peoples bosses.

Yet no one can tell me what the threat actually was. What was Bernstein going to do?

The public info being released was already public, this is the phrase public info.

Portnoy sells his company for $550 million, gets it back for free after Penn gets $2 billion from ESPN, and then Portnoy inks a new gambling agreement with Draft Kings.

Not sure who the bigger asshole is, Dave or Dan, but at least Dave is filthy rich with loyal minions to do his bidding. Dan has to dream about boobs on social media or Leila’s…..

that PENN CEO is bullet proof apparently

IS THAT A THREAT ???!!!

Portnoy sells his company for $550 million, gets it back for free after Penn gets $2 billion from ESPN, and then Portnoy inks a new gambling agreement with Draft Kings.

Not sure who the bigger asshole is, Dave or Dan, but at least Dave is filthy rich with loyal minions to do his bidding. Dan has to dream about boobs on social media or Leila’s…..