Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

The board is an outlier, a minute sample size of hapless goofs that are interested in sports talk radio.

Fairly apparent that live sports play by play can drive ratings, you see an uptick in ratings at WSCR during Cubs season, makes sense because it is unique live content that you cannot find elsewhere.

It would seem that you would want your on air talent to be providing unique personality driven content and attempt to appeal to a general audience.

You would then find the most popular local team and attempt to secure their broadcast rights, then build around that interest level and try not to get bogged down in endless chatter that drives away large swathes of listeners, and never have your on air hosts telling people not to listen to your product.

That is why the WMVP model makes more sense at this point in time.

Author:	whatsamotta_u [ Fri May 05, 2023 6:14 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
this is literally the worst thread ever

Author:	NWsider4-3-3 [ Fri May 05, 2023 10:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
have returned to the show after playing bernstein computer simulated historical baseball. satchel paige strikes out babe ruth on 2 pitches, roy campanella throws out ty cobb every time and josh gibson is 21 for 22 against bob feller. not sure how he got tucker carlson to comment on a brawl between ty cobb and the tigers with the homestead greys. the only player that does well against paige is hank greenberg.

Author:	Nardi [ Sat May 06, 2023 12:08 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
NWsider4-3-3 wrote: have returned to the show after playing bernstein computer simulated historical baseball. satchel paige strikes out babe ruth on 2 pitches, roy campanella throws out ty cobb every time and josh gibson is 21 for 22 against bob feller. not sure how he got tucker carlson to comment on a brawl between ty cobb and the tigers with the homestead greys. the only player that does well against paige is hank greenberg. Koufax walks Greenberg on four pitches and tips his cap.

Author:	Clawmaster [ Sat May 06, 2023 9:48 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
whatsamotta_u wrote: this is literally the worst thread ever Thanks for your call

Author:	TriColoredPastas [ Sun May 07, 2023 12:10 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
At what point can this board be used as a barometer of public opinion? The reviews are overwhelming negative here. The only other visible faction is twitch, which has devolved into a circlejerk of the most boring people imaginable after they either banned/drove off anyone interesting. What the fuck keeps this station viable outside of tradition?

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://www.chicagofanatics.com/

Making the switch http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=129808	Page 2 of 2

Author:	Clawmaster [ Mon May 08, 2023 9:42 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
The board is an outlier, a minute sample size of hapless goofs that are interested in sports talk radio. Fairly apparent that live sports play by play can drive ratings, you see an uptick in ratings at WSCR during Cubs season, makes sense because it is unique live content that you cannot find elsewhere. It would seem that you would want your on air talent to be providing unique personality driven content and attempt to appeal to a general audience. You would then find the most popular local team and attempt to secure their broadcast rights, then build around that interest level and try not to get bogged down in endless chatter that drives away large swathes of listeners, and never have your on air hosts telling people not to listen to your product. That is why the WMVP model makes more sense at this point in time.

Author:	billypootons [ Mon May 08, 2023 10:25 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Making the switch
Clawmaster wrote: The board is an outlier, a minute sample size of hapless goofs that are interested in sports talk radio. Fairly apparent that live sports play by play can drive ratings, you see an uptick in ratings at WSCR during Cubs season, makes sense because it is unique live content that you cannot find elsewhere. It would seem that you would want your on air talent to be providing unique personality driven content and attempt to appeal to a general audience. You would then find the most popular local team and attempt to secure their broadcast rights, then build around that interest level and try not to get bogged down in endless chatter that drives away large swathes of listeners, and never have your on air hosts telling people not to listen to your product. That is why the WMVP model makes more sense at this point in time. Are you trying to claim July's top rated 10pm show once or twice a week was driven by cubs lead in? No way

Page 2 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/