jasonfromCHATHAM wrote:
What will it take to make Blackhawk hockey and joy to watch again?
Well, for one thing, rules that have some logic behind them would be nice. What's with this ridiculous "one point for an overtime or shootout loss baloney?" Think about it. A regular game is worth TWO POINTS, TOTAL. Either the winner gets 2 and the loser nothing, or in the old days, 1 point each for a tie. Again, TWO POINTS TOTAL.
Now, as soon as a game goes into OT, there are going to be THREE POINTS awarded in the standings--2 to the winner and 1 to the loser. Why is this game suddenly worth MORE in total? Suppose you're Team A and you're sitting idle one night and you're trying to catch either Team B or Team C for a playoff spot. B and C are playing each other. Before, you knew you would lose 2 points total--either 2 to one team or 1 to both teams. Now, if B and C go into OT, you've automatically lost ground to BOTH teams to the tune of THREE points total--2 points to one and 1 to the other. Makes no sense to me. It's like if a baseball team got half a win for losing in extra innings.
Plus, the OT and shootout were supposed to add excitement. Not so, because both teams already have one point guaranteed. Losing in the OT or shootout isn't like a TRUE loss. Sometimes in quickie updates, the Score or MVP will say, "The Blackhawks lost last night." But, that's not enough information because if it was an OT or shootout loss, it's not the same as a real loss--they still got a point. Stupid, confusing, and illogical.