IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.
Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment
Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million
Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.
The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.
I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.
Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?
The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.
The Cubs have made out better than most.
I'm not getting pissy.... I showed you that there was over a billion dollar difference between the Yankees and Cubs payrolls over the last 20 years. That is not similar or even remotely close which was your original argument. You then typed a paragraph that had nothing to do with the original disagreement.
At no point did I say the Cubs spend like a small market club. The Cubs spend plenty of money and have spent a ton of it badly. Because of those deals, they had to trade Drew Smyly (who they paid to rehab) so they could pick up the option on Hamels who they had to trade for because of the failure of Darvish and Chatwood. Then they had to wait until what looks to be the retiring of Zobrist so they could spend money to sign Kimbrel to replace another bad signing in Morrow.
The Cubs have had three monster contracts. Lester, Darvish and Heyward. If two don't pan out? Uh oh.