Relax, Veggie. I think people are having a little fun with you because you seemed to be patting yourself on the back for making the brilliant observation that NFL MVP Lamar Jackson has been significantly more successful than Justin Fields.

Relax, Veggie. I think people are having a little fun with you because you seemed to be patting yourself on the back for making the brilliant observation that NFL MVP Lamar Jackson has been significantly more successful than Justin Fields.

There does seem to be an excessive pounding on Jackson who was indeed involved in the poor play of the team, but hardly not the only one, the poor game plan, and the poor execution of being "physical".

Trust me bro, significant # of posters here think there's not much difference between Lamar and Justin. Run a poll. Not into patting myself on the back, I think that's clawmasters speciality.

Lots of literalist understandings here, almost as if guys here expect Jackson to endorse Mitt Romney for president because that's what Manning did when he was the same age.

There does seem to be an excessive pounding on Jackson who was indeed involved in the poor play of the team, but hardly not the only one, the poor game plan, and the poor execution of being "physical".

Isn't that the nature of being an NFL quarterback?

Feel like we're getting off track. To clarify for me personally, Lamar deserves criticism. He should be criticized. He choked. MVPs shouldn't choke. He did. Therefore, criticism is welcome. It comes with the territory. What he's going through is exactly what Peyton Manning went through at this point during Manning's career. So group him with pre title Manning or pre title Dirk as MVPs who failed to deliver on the big stage. Don't group him with Sackstin Fields.