It is currently Wed May 15, 2024 9:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 42  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The need to call the proverbial "double tech" doesn't really help matters either. If its fair game then let it be fair game. If someone bothered to address people when they disagree with them about something then I wouldn't have to. Its that simple. He said something that was factually incorrect and I'm sure I'm not the only one that knows it. Rather than address him they swallowed the whistle as usual. Rather than simply state that it was incorrect he began hurling insults at me and its not the first time either. I responded in the way that i respond and will continue to respond.

I personally don't care if he or anyone here ever responds to anything that I write. At some point I will bounce from the joint anyway. It will be on my terms and in my own way though. I won't be bullied into anything so if that's the angle save it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
shakes wrote:
IMU wrote:
shakes wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Hey Shakes and LTG. When you are the only 2 people posting in the thread it's kind of insane to keep quoting each other.

I am concerned.


don't worry, I'm done with him forever. Won't quote, read or reply to anything he posts ever again. If he wants to ruin the NBA forum he's going to have to do it by himself. I think he's up to the challenge.

Does this mean you're in tomorrow?


Image

better?

Yes, that is the device needed if you decide you need to take any toll roads like I-90 to Real Time Sports. Glad to have you.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15021
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Bagels wrote:
Image

this really got out of hand.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:46 am
Posts: 86
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39808
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Admittedly, I have not yet seen Ball play. I find it hard to say though that anyone picked as highly as he was averaging on 10/7/7 is playing up to the hype in any way, shape or form.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55878
long time gay wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.

:lol: this post is hilarious.

You have been watching bball 60 yrs....45 of which you have been alive?

And the arrogance of your last paragraph is off the charts.

You have a lot of bball knowledge no doubt, but man take a few steps back.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
RFDC wrote:
long time gay wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.

:lol: this post is hilarious.

You have been watching bball 60 yrs....45 of which you have been alive?

And the arrogance of your last paragraph is off the charts.

You have a lot of bball knowledge no doubt, but man take a few steps back.


I think he was joking. Hard to tell with LTG, but I think he was trying to be Lavar Ball-esque in his critique.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 18975
RFDC wrote:
long time gay wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.

:lol: this post is hilarious.

You have been watching bball 60 yrs....45 of which you have been alive?

And the arrogance of your last paragraph is off the charts.

You have a lot of bball knowledge no doubt, but man take a few steps back.


Look at the screen name. You are responding to a Curious Hair mult.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55878
conns7901 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
long time gay wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.

:lol: this post is hilarious.

You have been watching bball 60 yrs....45 of which you have been alive?

And the arrogance of your last paragraph is off the charts.

You have a lot of bball knowledge no doubt, but man take a few steps back.


Look at the screen name. You are responding to a Curious Hair mult.


:lol: ah fuck. He got me

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
RFDC wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
long time gay wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Very weak offensive game from Lonzo tonight. Having trouble getting past his guy and into the lane. Lakers are moving the ball well overall though. He continues to play well defensively. A steal and 2 blocks so far and continuing to pass the eye test.


You lied about Thibs and Kyrie though so you are not a credible source. This is just your need to label the proverbial “eye test” even though your eyes have no credibility. If anyone took the time to note your poor eyesight, I wouldn’t have the need to do so. It’s really that easy. Revisionist history is all you people have. You and others say things that are factually indisputable, and I know for a fact that others see the same thing I’m seeing. I’ve been watching basketball for over 60 years, 45 of which I was alive for. Rather than celebrate that, you just hurl insults at me as usual. I personally think this is a ploy to prop up Abraham Lincoln more than he should be. But I see that false narrative, and I won’t stop calling it what it is. Kyrie would destroy Abe in a 7-game series, and everyone knows it but they won’t admit it. Just ask Steph Curry. His stats might have been better last year, but you know damn well Steph never led any abolitionists and he sure as hell didn’t take on Lincoln 1-on-1.

This shit is chess for me, and you all are playing checkers. I didn’t get a masters in this for nothing. And I won’t be bullied into saying Lonzo will salvage the union. That’s just groupthink that runs rampant around these parts. I will be endorsing my support for this shit on my terms and in my own way. I won’t be bullied. This masters degree didn’t write itself.

:lol: this post is hilarious.

You have been watching bball 60 yrs....45 of which you have been alive?

And the arrogance of your last paragraph is off the charts.

You have a lot of bball knowledge no doubt, but man take a few steps back.


Look at the screen name. You are responding to a Curious Hair mult.


:lol: ah fuck. He got me


Got me, too!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


I don't think you watched the game. He took 2 shots. Lillard got by him at most twice the entire game.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
shakes wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


I don't think you watched the game. He took 2 shots. Lillard got by him at most twice the entire game.



Literally, no one needs to watch the game in this case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


I don't think you watched the game. He took 2 shots. Lillard got by him at most twice the entire game.



Literally, no one needs to watch the game in this case.


thank you for proving my point.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


I don't think you watched the game. He took 2 shots. Lillard got by him at most twice the entire game.



Literally, no one needs to watch the game in this case.

Lillard did almost all his damage at the free throw line and was 2-7 on shots where Lonzo was guarding him. This is why it helps to watch the games.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
shakes wrote:
another tentative game for Lonzo. as the announcers kept saying, he needs to be more assertive. It's really only a confidence issue. Plus he is deferring way too much to teammates. But, other than that he played pretty good. Real solid defensively again, did a great job on Lillard when he was matched up on him.

His talents for pushing the ball are wasted on this team. He does a great job head manning the ball on the break, but then the guy who gets it invariably decides to stop at the top of the key and dribble a bunch of times which allows the D to catch up. KCP is fucking brutal to watch on the offensive side of the ball. IMO he should just stay on the D side of the ball and not even bother coming down court for offense.

The one silver lining last night was Larry Nance getting hurt. Now Walton will have no choice but to start Kuzma.

As the pros have said, Lonzo needs a few times around the league to get comfortable. I'm looking forward to next year when he gets to throw passes to Paul George and probably someone else who can play as well.



He scored 0 points, had 4 assists, and 3 rebounds. He sucked last night. Lillard had 32 points, 5 assists, and 6 rebounds. He destroyed Ball.


I don't think you watched the game. He took 2 shots. Lillard got by him at most twice the entire game.



Literally, no one needs to watch the game in this case.

Lillard did almost all his damage at the free throw line and was 2-7 on shots where Lonzo was guarding him. This is why it helps to watch the games.


No, you really do not need to watch a game to know Ball sucked ass last night and Lillard did not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Lillard played better but if you're gonna just go by box scores at least check more than just three stats. Lonzo had the best +/- of anyone on the team. He was on the court in the 2nd and 3rd quarter when they went on big runs. A lot of that was due to him making defensive plays and keeping the ball moving on offense. As shakes said, he played very passively, but he did not "suck ass".

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Lillard played better but if you're gonna just go by box scores at least check more than just three stats. Lonzo had the best +/- of anyone on the team. He was on the court in the 2nd and 3rd quarter when they went on big runs. A lot of that was due to him making defensive plays and keeping the ball moving on offense. As shakes said, he played very passively, but he did not "suck ass".



Sounds more like luck that the other guys on the floor with him picked up his slack.

I'm sure the Lakers would be happy to have a rookie line for Lonzo that shows 28 mpg, 0 ppg, 3 apg and 4 rbg as long as he passes the ball quickly to people who are actually being productive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Lillard played better but if you're gonna just go by box scores at least check more than just three stats. Lonzo had the best +/- of anyone on the team. He was on the court in the 2nd and 3rd quarter when they went on big runs. A lot of that was due to him making defensive plays and keeping the ball moving on offense. As shakes said, he played very passively, but he did not "suck ass".



Sounds more like luck that the other guys on the floor with him picked up his slack.

I'm sure the Lakers would be happy to have a rookie line for Lonzo that shows 28 mpg, 0 ppg, 3 apg and 4 rbg as long as he passes the ball quickly to people who are actually being productive.

Well if we want to get into absurd arguments I'm sure the Lakers would be thrilled if Lonzo averaged a steal and 2 blocks and kept his opponent under 30% shooting on shots he guarded.

It wasn't a good game for Lonzo but "Lillard destroyed Ball" is simply wrong. I can't blame someone for seeing a box score and concluding that though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15021
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I say we don't let people comment in NBA threads on a certain game unless they've seen it. I'm happy to share my pass with anyone. It's how I get to sleep at night.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
City of Fools wrote:
I say we don't let people comment in NBA threads on a certain game unless they've seen it. I'm happy to share my pass with anyone. It's how I get to sleep at night.

You're a good man. You're one of my top thirty four posters. PM me the login details and tell me which Wolves games you're not going to watch.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15021
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
IMU wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
I say we don't let people comment in NBA threads on a certain game unless they've seen it. I'm happy to share my pass with anyone. It's how I get to sleep at night.

You're a good man. You're one of my top thirty four posters. PM me the login details and tell me which Wolves games you're not going to watch.

abso

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
https://twitter.com/JustRyCole/status/9 ... %3D1631984


yep, let's definitely call Lonzo a bust after an 8 game career.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
shakes wrote:
https://twitter.com/JustRyCole/status/926473533957345280/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.realgm.com%2Fboards%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ft%3D1631984


yep, let's definitely call Lonzo a bust after an 8 game career.

I'm most interested in how long it'll take people to acknowledge he's good defensively. He's been bad offensively though. Opposite of what was advertised in some ways

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31549
pizza_Place: Milano's
D'angelo Russell revenge game tonight

Goes for minimum 30


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I'm finally willing to agree with the hot take of Kuzma > Ball. I think Ball will be a good player but Kuzma is gonna be great.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
FavreFan wrote:
I'm finally willing to agree with the hot take of Kuzma > Ball. I think Ball will be a good player but Kuzma is gonna be great.


It's more of a short sighted take than a hot take. Kuz has been awesome, easily the biggest steal of the draft at #27. But, he's also a very mature rookie, entered the league at 22 years old. Lonzo entered the league at 19 (now 20).


Lonzo played very well last night in every aspect except one, but its a glaring one since its so obvious. 3/15 from the field last nihgt, but played really good defense on Russell and also did a great job dictating the pace of the game. Finished with 7 assists and 0 turnovers, nothing to scoff at especially for a 20 year old rookie PG.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16398
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Lonzo with 1 turnover in the last 3 games. Also leads all rookies in points saved on defense.

The only thing he isn't doing is shooting. Last night he was over aggressive looking for his shot trying to make up for the passive game he had the night before.

It's going to take him a couple years to really find his groove, but I'm looking forward to seeing the finished product. Really looking forward to seeing him play with maybe a Paul George and who knows who else next year.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 42  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group