It is currently Thu Oct 31, 2024 6:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 821 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 28  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
This Packers team has really regressed as the season has gone on. I love it.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
:lol: :lol: :lol:

what a great way to cap off the Christmas weekend.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37743
Location: ...
ouch. 31-0 now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Might want to consider pulling ARod from this game.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57082
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81888
fun

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Vikes putting it on em in Lambeau.

Might be a good thing for GB tho.. Winner gets Seattle n loser gets skins.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81277
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I lost to a Kirk Cousins led team because of Aaron Rodgers.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12425
312player wrote:
Vikes putting it on em in Lambeau.

Might be a good thing for GB tho.. Winner gets Seattle n loser gets skins.


Could be a blessing in disguise, except that GB is not a good team and haven't been since that 6-0 start. Their offense is completely broken, and these game plans designed around running the ball with Lacy aren't doing anything but chewing up clock.

Maybe they turn these around in the 4th quarter or next week, but hard to see how.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13209
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
BD wrote:
312player wrote:
Vikes putting it on em in Lambeau.

Might be a good thing for GB tho.. Winner gets Seattle n loser gets skins.


Could be a blessing in disguise, except that GB is not a good team and haven't been since that 6-0 start. Their offense is completely broken, and these game plans designed around running the ball with Lacy aren't doing anything but chewing up clock.

Maybe they turn these around in the 4th quarter or next week, but hard to see how.

Losing tonight would give them a chance to win 1 play-off game but they are a very vulnerable team. They have zero chance at making a run. No deep threat at all...easy to defend.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 3:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I'm not sure they beat Washington in RFK, Skins are just as good as Minnesota.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:48 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12425
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
BD wrote:
312player wrote:
Vikes putting it on em in Lambeau.

Might be a good thing for GB tho.. Winner gets Seattle n loser gets skins.


Could be a blessing in disguise, except that GB is not a good team and haven't been since that 6-0 start. Their offense is completely broken, and these game plans designed around running the ball with Lacy aren't doing anything but chewing up clock.

Maybe they turn these around in the 4th quarter or next week, but hard to see how.

Losing tonight would give them a chance to win 1 play-off game but they are a very vulnerable team. They have zero chance at making a run. No deep threat at all...easy to defend.


It could be a blessing in disguise to get Washington on the road vs. Seattle at home, but if they continue playing the way they have, they are probably going to lose to the Redskins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18478
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Gonna win the Super Bowl.

Can wait to see my boy Dom Capers fitted for another ring.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I think Zona or Carolina whoop em, that o- line is still real bad.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81888
312player wrote:
I think Zona or Carolina whoop em, that o- line is still real bad.


receivers aren't very good either. They weren't exactly getting open yesterday. When they were open, Rodgers missed them.

Packers went down 11-0. They would have been buried by a good team at that point.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72371
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Agreed. Despite it being difficult to dominate a team two times in a row, I'd be really surprised if GB kept this next game within single digits.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81888
The blowout was because of turnovers. I think the Pack can play an error free game and still get pounded. Try the Cobb out of the backfield for longer than a couple of plays against the Cards and he may be going home in a body bag.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72371
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
The blowout was because of turnovers. I think the Pack can play an error free game and still get pounded. Try the Cobb out of the backfield for longer than a couple of plays against the Cards and he may be going home in a body bag.

You'll see that look this weekend. It's where he's the most effective, and it's the playoffs. Not a time for restraint.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Packers will win this week.

Everyone knows this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
It's one game... in the NFL... against Aaron Rodgers. To make any definitive statements would be crazy.

That said, Arizona by 50.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Quote:
Unrestricted Free Agents:
OT Don Barclay
K Mason Crosby
LS Brett Goode (currently on IR)
DT Letroy Guion
CB Casey Hayward
WR James Jones
FB John Kuhn
OLB Mike Neal
OLB Nick Perry (declined 5th-year option)
TE Andrew Quarless
NT B.J. Raji
S Sean Richardson (currently on IR)
RB James Starks
QB Scott Tolzien

Restricted Free Agents
:
OLB Andy Mulumba
G Lane Taylor

Exclusive-Rights Free Agents:
S Chris Banjo
TE Justin Perillo

Of that crew I see Crosby, Guion, Neal and Starks back.

No difference if Raji returns. I'd welcome Perry only if he signs cheap.

Heyward probably gets overpaid somewhere else.

The future is bright for the Packers and the division still runs through Green Bay for a minimum of the next 10 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81888
I don't see how you couldn't have seen that power shift towards Minnesota. I expect Bridgewater to progress and much of their talent to remain static. Even if Peterson slows down, I love what I've seen of Mc Kinnon

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Minnesota will be a very good 2nd place team for the next 5 years. Zimmer is an excellent coach and their GM is a solid drafter.

However, Bridgewater's ceiling is probably a slightly better Alex Smith.

Can't win a Super Bowl with a checkdown QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72371
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
I don't see how you couldn't have seen that power shift towards Minnesota. I expect Bridgewater to progress and much of their talent to remain static. Even if Peterson slows down, I love what I've seen of Mc Kinnon

Bridgewater places a pretty hard ceiling on Minnesota. I think they'll compete with Green Bay when Green Bay isn't having a great regular season, but I doubt they will be a Super Bowl contender with Bridgewater ever.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81888
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I don't see how you couldn't have seen that power shift towards Minnesota. I expect Bridgewater to progress and much of their talent to remain static. Even if Peterson slows down, I love what I've seen of Mc Kinnon

Bridgewater places a pretty hard ceiling on Minnesota. I think they'll compete with Green Bay when Green Bay isn't having a great regular season, but I doubt they will be a Super Bowl contender with Bridgewater ever.


like most dome teams, I think there playoff success will be dome dependent

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72371
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I don't see how you couldn't have seen that power shift towards Minnesota. I expect Bridgewater to progress and much of their talent to remain static. Even if Peterson slows down, I love what I've seen of Mc Kinnon

Bridgewater places a pretty hard ceiling on Minnesota. I think they'll compete with Green Bay when Green Bay isn't having a great regular season, but I doubt they will be a Super Bowl contender with Bridgewater ever.


like most dome teams, I think there playoff success will be dome dependent

What does that mean?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37743
Location: ...
minnesota doesn't play in a dome anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72371
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
W_Z wrote:
minnesota doesn't play in a dome anymore.

I was gonna say that, but then I googled it and it looks like they will play in a fixed roof stadium starting next year. I'll give dolphin the benefit of the doubt there. But I still don't know what his post meant.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 821 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 28  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group