rogers park bryan wrote:
Duncan cheats. Why dont any of the pitchers take the "wisdom" with them?
You might be overlooking the defensive shifting I mentioned earlier. Duncan has charts and videos of every hitter and is responsible for most of the defensive shifts in the game. The positioning is coordinated with the signs to Molina and vary according to pitch location. Most pitching coaches don’t assume anywhere near that level of control over in game strategy. He has honed his system over many years and probably comes from his playing days being a light hitting catcher. The only other team, to my knowledge, that uses such an extensive system is the Halos, Scioscia also being a former catcher.
I was watching the 20 inning Mets / Cards debacle last night,and there is no doubt that the Duncan Effect can be observed. Mets have a bunch of pull happy hitters like Francoer, Tatis and Bay. In addition Bay and Wright stand way off the plate. Now when you start to observe outfielders shading to the right when the book says to play these hitters to pull, you know there is a methodology to the way the pitchers are throwing. Sure enough Cardinal pitchers were throwing sinkers and fastballs on the outside all night (often 3 or 4 inches off the plate) and for some reason Mets hitters flailed away and never adjusted or tried to hit to right.
This is the kind of stuff that pitching coaches do, you know... teach pitchers how to pitch. Duncan is a different animal altogether, more like a Defensive Coordinator, so comparing him to Rothschild or anyone might not be completely fair.
Some Duncan projects have regressed, but not all. Looper went to Milwaukee and blew. Wellemeyer looks awful in SF right now. The book is out on Pineiro. Marquis has been much better than he was in St Louis. Lohse signed back, but he didn't look all that good last year. In any case the biggest variable in all of these is Duncan so it's fair to say his philosophy doesn't work on everyone.