shakes wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
shakes wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
shakes wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Last 5 games he is avg. 18 per game and shooting close to 50% from the field. He's definitely stepped it up and had an impact when it was necessary for him to do so.
Someone needs to do a wellness check on LTG. or at least let him know his account has been hacked.

You said he was a "stud" and he has never come close to that. You have ran away from that comment ever since.
I'm acknowledging that he is currently playing good ball. Still doesn't make him a good player. His numbers are extremely pedestrian for a guy who plays the number of minutes he plays.
never mind, he's back.
BTW, I clearly won this one. I said he was a stud, you said he would be out of the league. He's a lot closer to stud than the CBA.
No he isn't. He isn't even in the top 25 at his position. You were quiet as a church mouse about him for 4 years now.
"Studs" make All Star teams. Any bet as to when Lonzo will make his 1st?
Your "stud" designation was a "bust". Your only hope is that he can be a serviceable starter at this point.
naw that's all BS. I guarantee i can find more PG rankings that have Lonzo in the top 25 than you can find with him outside the top 25.
Lonzo is not a stud. That has already been established years ago. Not sure why you just brought up that he is not a stud when it has already been clearly established and admitted by me and everyone that is not a stud. Even admitted by me in the post you responded to.
But, he is not a bust. That has also already been established.
As for his play on the court, it is objectively true that he is a lot closer to stud than being out of the league.
But, go ahead and respond that LoNZo is NoTT a STUd!1!!!1 one more time. Makes you look either really stupid or just incapable of putting forth a coherent argument to support your position.
This is where MANY of your arguments go flat. You always quote STATS when it comes to Trae yet you push Intangibles when it comes to Lonzo.
Pick a lane. Jalen Brunson (Career backup) has better numbers than Lonzo across the board. Points, Shooting ,Percentage, Assists etc. This despite playing fewer minutes.
Even If I concede that Brunson is a worse player the gap isn't that large.
Brunson isn't anyone's "stud" or even close to it. He is a pro. So is Lonzo. Lonzo Ball was compared to All Time great players when he first entered the league.
He was considered by MANY (including you) to be the next great Laker. In the context of what he was projected to be he flopped. Tremendously. Is he a bust in the mode of say Kwame Brown? No he isn't that.
Is he a bust in the context of being the next Jason Kidd? Hell yeah he is. Every team that he has played on prior to this season have been losers. He has to own some of that. If he is the dude you claim him to be (even now) then the Bulls will make a deep playoff run. Conf Finals at minimum. He should be able to get them there with that supporting cast.
_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.