KDdidit wrote:
a genius wrote:
Interesting take in the Herald; they opined that the beginning of the end for Nagy was the blown London game, starting with outsmarting themselves by arriving in London 4 days after the Raiders.
https://www.dailyherald.com/apps/pbcs.d ... 331&ref=arQuote:
• In a remarkable foretelling of all The Nagy Era has disintegrated into, Gruden's gang somehow plugged together a 15-play, 93-yard drive that culminated when Josh Jacobs hurdled into the London air with 1:57 remaining for the winning TD.
Strangely one of the first signs the wheels were falling off the team was the frequent times the D shit the bed in the 4th Q. That's one thing I can't really blame Nagy for. Maybe you can say the offensive ineptitude the previous 3 quarters in games caused the D to be gassed, but they still had leads in the 4th they pissed away.
I'm not sure if you participated in, or know/care about, the W/L debate on the board for MLB pitchers. One side maintains that W/L is meaningless because Ws for pitchers often rely on run support, so the thinking is a lack of run support in a game you're on record for losing essentially makes that "L" meaningless. After all, how can you blame a pitcher for losing a 1-0 game. The opposing side says no, you're indeed a loser because all you had to do was meet or beat the performance of your counterpart. Your counterpart gave up 0 runs and you gave up 1 run, so therefore you deserve the loss and moreover that L does indeed mean something about your performance and quality as a pitcher.
I think your view on the defense "pissing away" leads puts you firmly in the pro-W/L camp, meaning you'd probably also blame a pitcher for losing a 1-0 decision after, say, he gives up a walk-off HR in the 9th inning. I'm in the other camp - I don't blame the pitcher for the 1-0 loss and I would hesitate for blaming the defense for giving up leads/TDs. For me, the "run support/offensive production" matters. Here's an extreme example, but if the Bears are up 3-0 late in the 4th quarter and then give up a TD with no time remaining...that sucks, yes. But I'm not framing the loss as the Bears D failing to hold a lead, even though that's factually true. I think it's analytically incorrect because it implies that the Bears should have held the opposing team scoreless, an almost impossible standard. Just like it's unreasonable to blame the pitcher for the loss after he gave up a single run. For me, it's about holding the D to a reasonable standard going into the game, a standard that allows for points given up to the other team. Offenses are going to score, the rules are designed to make scoring easier than it's ever been. Hopefully your offense pulls their own weight if you do the same on your end.