Hey, if you wanted more evidence that the NFL is stringing Chicago along on this draft thing and that we're about to see a hard push for a new NFL/Los Angeles marriage, here's something interesting. The league might just build Los Angeles's new stadium entirely with money from their new stadium fund, which in the past has doled out subsidies to the 49ers and the NY teams.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foo ... s-landlordQuote:
The newspaper writes that a team could move to L.A. the old-fashioned way by building a stadium itself (most likely with a loan from the NFL in order to do so) and then owning that stadium and all the profits that are generated by it. But ... the league also could pay for its own stadium and then reap the benefits of naming rights, personal seat licenses and whatever else could be sold.
Another reason that could benefit the NFL entirely: the other 31 teams could share in that stadium-generated revenue.
But why would a franchise that's relocating to L.A. agree to the NFL acting as its landlord?
"That's the pivotal question, and there are a lot of owners who wouldn't want Big Brother as a landlord," writes reporter Sam Farmer. "That said, the NFL could make it more enticing by giving tenants control of key revenue streams such as sales of suites, club and general admission seats, local sponsorship and advertising, parking and the like. The challenge for the league would be making the deal attractive enough."
Another advantage: the NFL could begin building the stadium right away in order to be ready for a team to be named later. That way, a franchise that's relocating could announce that its leaving its host city and already have a new stadium waiting in L.A., thereby avoiding the ire (and eventual disinterest) of the original city's fans who the team still would want to fill the lameduck stadium.
I don't think this is very likely. It doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense. But neither does staging games in London, and they're doing that.
I do think it's inevitable that the NFL is back in Los Angeles very soon. Rams owner Stan Kroenke has bought up a big swath of land in Inglewood, of Fabulous Forum and "Compton, Long Beach, INGLEWOOOOOD" fame, which would be a better fit for a football stadium than the other locations that we've heard about. Meanwhile, Missouri and St. Louis don't seem too jazzed about building an expensive new stadium for the Rams after building the current one 19 years ago.
_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.