wdelaney72 wrote:
I think you are giving Bernie too much credit…and keep in mind, I like a lot of what Bernie had to say in the campaign, but there’s history and some basic common sense here:
1) Bernie is a career politician
2) Bernie did and has aligned himself under the Democratic party
3) The Democratic party chose Hillary as their candidate a long, long time ago.
4) Bernie was incredibly soft on Hillary during the primary. He swung a little harder down the stretch as his popularity grew, but overall….he pussy-footed around Hillary.
If Bernie truly wanted to create a revolution, he had a few different options. He could have exposed Hillary and the Democratic and brought down the party. He could have run as an independent. He didn’t do either. He started with the party and is staying there like a good soldier.
There never was a revolution. Sad thing is….there could have been. Bernie’s popularity grew WAY beyond his and the Democratic parties wildest imagination.
I think you're missing the point. Bernie isn't a revolutionary, but it has to start somewhere. The core people supporting Bernie aren't just rolling over and voting for Clinton. Some of his supporters will, but those are the unprincipled dilettantes like Sarah Silverman rather than true believers. Whether Bernie himself was a true believer or not is immaterial. Trump and Sanders are just the beginning of an era of unrest and upheaval. A Hillary Clinton presidency isn't going to put an end to that.