Walt Williams Neck wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I liked both teams and was just wanting to see a good game.
But I do kind of agree with the people complaining about the call being reversed to give Virginia the ball late. At every level of basketball that is TT's ball....and if you have to break it down to see if a pinky barely touched the ball or not then the call on the court should stand.
Did you think his finger touched it?
I did.
Yeah it very well could have....but to have to break it down to that level to see....when you could also see that it looked like the kid got fouled as the ball was knocked away as well. Just seemed like a situation where the call on the floor should stand.
we are the ones bemoaning to get the call right....get rid of umps and use an electric strike zone....they use it we don't like it

i didnt think it was 100% conclusive that the TT player touched the ball with the pinky. Not enough to overturn in my opinion.
But I sure has hell enjoyed "RULES EXPERT" Gene "Rather be at the Gym" Steratore initially stating conclusively it would be TT ball... only to 100% reverse course after the pinky supposedly touched the ball less than one minute later.
the only replay I loathe more than basketball replay is baseball replay... both replay processes take way too fucking long to complete