Libraries are really reaching to compete with the internet now it seems.

_________________
My Maserati does 186.

We are but if you bring any of that faggy hard seltzer stuff, you can keep your cuck ass at home.

_________________

Silly me assuming that it'd be an Iron City, Yuengling, or Rolling Rock...

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner

current members cosplaying as other/former members is a thing

Chicosplay Fanatics

There are a handful of people I've met here and I doubt that their opinions of me have changed. Except for the trolls like B rogue and you. Not that it really matters. But you keep being twisted by Covid and the assorted bigots you enable here. But I still wish happiness for you and your family. You were once a friend.

God bless.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.

Pay not attention to the mult behind the curtain.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

Not you though , your thoughts on DRUMPF and Covid ? Not twisted at all .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Correct. Just in case. You control the board. Make a selection. Will you stay with
"abstract arguments liberals make on messageboards" for $400?

You have to excuse Pittchfork. He seems to have confused "Malt" as in Liquor, for word Mult. It's an honest mistake given the circumstances.

_________________

He's actually a Low (in) Brow kind of guy. Actually the drunken boozer persona he often portrayed Herr wad the perfect cover for him, as he actually was sober a great deal of the time.

_________________

I'm sure you see it that way. But I've never gotten nasty with you the way you have with me.

I think your recent political opinions are overwrought and wrong. For example, we used to agree about how nefarious the U.S. surveillance state was until you got behind it when it became a tool to be used against a president you despised. But I've never had any personal animus toward you.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Jorr you openly cheerleaded when Comey broke protocol and "threatened" to reopen the server case right before the election. This demonstrated just how much you stood in opposition to the "surveillance state right there. It's clear that your opinions (Clinton Foundation vs Trump Charities for instance), change according to whether the person is your "guy" or not. Currently you are beating the drums for Hunter to be pinched (for taxes) when just a few months earlier you claimed that it was bullshit that they were going after Trump and his minions for tax evasion. Its clear that MANY of your arguments lack logical consistency to say the least.

_________________

The Hillary/Huma/pedo stuff was an example of the surveillance state run amok?

_________________

Wrong. And you can't show me any such statement that I ever made that was anything like that. Comey NEVER should have said a damn thing. But he "exonerated" her for political reasons- to hurt Trump- and then when he saw he may have his own tit in a ringer he had to come back out and say he what he did to cover his ass.

Comey is a bad guy. Always was. He didn't just become one when he was forced to say something that may have hurt Hillary Clinton.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

I've never mentioned Hunter Biden's tax issues. Not once. You're free to do a search.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

So now the question becomes, why must you lie about the things I've said? It must be bigotry against me, you damn BIGOT!

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Jorr is second only to me when it comes to holding logically consistent positions

_________________

However that appears to be the most egregious thing that he has done by all accounts. And he should go to jail for it. Your Ukraine stuff is just silly because at most all he appears to have done is use his father's connections to get a gig.

And besides Hunter isn't Joe Biden. Where is all of the meat on Joe Biden that you promised? Same place all of the meat is on Hillary? Nowhere to be found.

_________________

Jorr this is revisionist. Oct of 16 you cheerlead when Comey broke protocol. And he did it, admittedly much later, for political reasons wirh it quite possibly costing her the presidency. None of that bothered you, and you were hardly critical of Comey at the time. You only started criticizing him after he went after Trump.

With the Clinton Foundation you criticized the hell out of them for "defrauding their charity", yet when Trump was proven to have defrauded his own charity you really didn't give a shit about it.
Whenever Trump has been shown to be running a scam you pooh pooh it, only to claim that it is everyone else that loves "degenerates". Huh?

_________________

Please quote the posts. You can't. Because you are just a guy who is full of shit. Just like you were wrong about when the vaccines were available. You're wrong almost all the time and teaching children so they can be wrong too. What a world.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

.Edit.

_________________

.

You see Jorr what you are about to observe below is what "WE" in the Field of Education like to refer to as "supporting evidence" . You might want to take "notes" while you're at it. Its because of this particular strategy that students, such as the ones that are taught by me, are able to immediately cut through all of the double speak and bullshit of hypocritical rubes such as yourself. If provided with the necessary tools, any student or person with a functioning brain can see that you are utterly full of shit on BOTH accounts. First with the Clinton Foundation and later with Comey.
As stated previously, for the better part of 5-6 years you have proceeded to make a complete ass of yourself with all of the rationalizing and excusing of Trump's actions and behavior that you do around here. Below are but 2 examples of this.





You pulled the exact same stunt last time too.







Liar, Denier pants on fire!







As same move in fact.


and here. But yeah it was all in "passing".





Face it dude the honesty with you is "dishonesty". You can't tell the truth about much of anything.

_________________

Jorr obviously cheerlead the effort every step of the way.





















There wasn't one ounce of indignation to be found anywhere. If this were Drumpf he'd be bitching about "witchhunts" "media" "deep state" and all thar other bullshit. What a hypocrite!

_________________

Not one of those posts is me "cheerleading" Jim Comey. Not one of those quotes is me claiming the Clintons defrauded their charity. You spent a lot of time looking shit up and couldn't find any of the stuff you accused me of saying. You fucking liar.

Yeah, I think Hillary Clinton is a scumbag. You didn't have to search my posts to determine that. I could have just told you.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Hey Jorr you had plenty of opportunity to voice your "displeasure" with Comey for breaking "protocol" regarding the timing of his "investigation" and you didn't say one word about it. It's clear from my "reporting" that you hoped for Comey to hit "paydirt" every step of the way. Your only consternation with Comey is that he never pressed charges the first time. It's clear from my "reporting" and supporting "evidence" that you had no problem with his reopening of the case, nor did you have a problem with the rule that he clearly broke in reopening it, as cited clearly below




This was clearly an effort at "cheerleading" on your part.

_________________

This all just shows what a disingenuous phony you are. You searched my posts and tried- futilely- to quote posts that you felt supported your lies.

My position on Comey has never changed. He should have never weighed in or exonerated Clinton in the first place. He tried to stick his nose into the election in favor of Clinton. Then he realized there might be stuff out there that could make him look bad. If that's "cheerleading", I'll own it.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

So your your "refutation" of the charges is nothing more than another one of your "biased", (hey Jorr I also "educate" students on how to spot that bullshit too) kooky conspiracy theories? You're "certain"
And it's obvious that your "scathing critique" of Comey came only after he began investigating Trump. This is something which i stated earlier and can easily be support with "evidence". Comey only became a "pariah" after he started investigating your guy Trump.

_________________

Whatever. I'm bored with you and your lies.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Most "certainly" you are

_________________