It is currently Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:42 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 15
  [ 422 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.

They’ve been pretty bad.

Had Love not airmailed that INT, you’re looking at 3 TDs on 4 drives.

Extending drives by preventing big plays and letting offenses, especially Jordan Love-led offenses, run a lot of plays is a viable and effective strategy. You bet that if you can keep them from scoring for 10-15 plays he’ll make a turnover worthy play.

This is bend-don’t-break. It works, fans hate it but its really the best you can do for the vast majority of teams when the guys on the other side are pros too.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Doctor Of Style
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12983
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
The Bears have had to resort to running an option offense with a "Generational Guy" at QB :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26422
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I think Braxton Jones just murdered a guy.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5485
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Great drive. Pound the rock and wear down that defense help out the rookie QB. Keep the pressure on GB

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Thrown to nowhere. How many times is he gonna do that? It’s such a joke. First overall pick has no idea where the ball is going when it leaves his hand.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Doctor Of Style
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12983
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Bears have competed today.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Green Bay came out, scored and thought they had the Bears beat. Took their foot off the pedal in the first quarter. Always a pitfall. LeFleur is furious for good reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Doctor Of Style
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12983
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
The worst part about Caleb Williams as a QB is that there are too MANY throws by him where he doesn't even give his receivers a chance to make a play. The throw to Kmet being but the latest.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57960
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think Braxton Jones just murdered a guy.

that was beautiful

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26422
pizza_Place: Pizanos
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.

They’ve been pretty bad.

Had Love not airmailed that INT, you’re looking at 3 TDs on 4 drives.

Extending drives by preventing big plays and letting offenses, especially Jordan Love-led offenses, run a lot of plays is a viable and effective strategy. You bet that if you can keep them from scoring for 10-15 plays he’ll make a turnover worthy play.

This is bend-don’t-break. It works, fans hate it but it’s really the best you can do for the vast majority of teams when the guys on the other side are pros too.

They’re mostly breaking. I’m not sure why that’s ok. It’s not like they’re forcing FGs like a Lovie defense.

The Bears D is getting their shit pushed in every drive and Love bailed them out on a play that would’ve had you & TDS demanding Bagent had Williams made it.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
The worst part about Caleb Williams as a QB is that there are too MANY throws by him where he doesn't even give his receivers a chance to make a play. The throw to Kmet being buy the latest.

It’s pathetic. He’s so far off from being even a serviceable quarterback. The new OC came out here and ran him, which has clearly taken the Packers somewhat be surprise, but we have seen this with Mitch & Fields…its not sustainable. You gotta throw the ball.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5485
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Need a big play from the defense.. big hit for a loss, sack, TO.. something


Make a play here

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.

They’ve been pretty bad.

Had Love not airmailed that INT, you’re looking at 3 TDs on 4 drives.

Extending drives by preventing big plays and letting offenses, especially Jordan Love-led offenses, run a lot of plays is a viable and effective strategy. You bet that if you can keep them from scoring for 10-15 plays he’ll make a turnover worthy play.

This is bend-don’t-break. It works, fans hate it but it’s really the best you can do for the vast majority of teams when the guys on the other side are pros too.

They’re mostly breaking. I’m not sure why that’s ok. It’s not like they’re forcing FGs like a Lovie defense.

The Bears D is getting their shit pushed in every drive and Love bailed them out on a play that would’ve had you & TDS demanding Bagent had Williams made it.

We’ll see how they do here. I’ve been mostly satisfied with the way they’ve played. Allow two big drives in three quarters against a team that rushes for like 170 yards a game? OK, I’ll take it. Again this is just not going to be perfect…the guys on the other side are really good too.

They could just roll over in the fourth and die. Who knows, LeFleur is very good at pressing weaknesses and adjusting in game.
Top
 Profile  
 
The Doctor Of Style
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12983
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.

They’ve been pretty bad.

Had Love not airmailed that INT, you’re looking at 3 TDs on 4 drives.

Extending drives by preventing big plays and letting offenses, especially Jordan Love-led offenses, run a lot of plays is a viable and effective strategy. You bet that if you can keep them from scoring for 10-15 plays he’ll make a turnover worthy play.

This is bend-don’t-break. It works, fans hate it but it’s really the best you can do for the vast majority of teams when the guys on the other side are pros too.

They’re mostly breaking. I’m not sure why that’s ok. It’s not like they’re forcing FGs like a Lovie defense.

The Bears D is getting their shit pushed in every drive and Love bailed them out on a play that would’ve had you & TDS demanding Bagent had Williams made it.


I've called Int Love out on numerous occasions. Not a fan.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
People want to hate on Tyrique Stevenson but Hicks falling down is what allowed that to happen.
Top
 Profile  
 
One Post
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4172
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.


They aren’t stopping GB on ANY drives.
Top
 Profile  
 
Juice's Lecture Notes
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23909
pizza_Place: Giordano's
This above average Bears defense better hope for another gift INT in the red zone.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5485
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
My goodness how do you let him catch that shit.. Flus has to dial something up for fucksakes

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
Seacrest
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 39226
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
USA wrote:
People want to hate on Tyrique Stevenson but Hicks falling down is what allowed that to happen.


Are you watching the same game as the rest of us? Stevenson was nowhere near that play.

If GORDON turns around, he’s got an easy interception

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Seacrest wrote:
USA wrote:
People want to hate on Tyrique Stevenson but Hicks falling down is what allowed that to happen.


Are you watching the same game as the rest of us? Stevenson was nowhere near that play.

If GORDON turns around, he’s got an easy interception

Right. I’m saying Stevenson probably doesn’t allow that.
Top
 Profile  
 
This Ends in Antioch
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26422
pizza_Place: Pizanos
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
One Post wrote:
This Bears D can’t stop the run or pass. The GB pass catchers aren’t just open, the are open by 10 yards.

They can’t do it every drive. They’ve done alright today, that drive was disappointing but its obvious LeFleur came out of halftime with some ways to attack the Bears.

They’ve been pretty bad.

Had Love not airmailed that INT, you’re looking at 3 TDs on 4 drives.

Extending drives by preventing big plays and letting offenses, especially Jordan Love-led offenses, run a lot of plays is a viable and effective strategy. You bet that if you can keep them from scoring for 10-15 plays he’ll make a turnover worthy play.

This is bend-don’t-break. It works, fans hate it but it’s really the best you can do for the vast majority of teams when the guys on the other side are pros too.

They’re mostly breaking. I’m not sure why that’s ok. It’s not like they’re forcing FGs like a Lovie defense.

The Bears D is getting their shit pushed in every drive and Love bailed them out on a play that would’ve had you & TDS demanding Bagent had Williams made it.

We’ll see how they do here. I’ve been mostly satisfied with the way they’ve played. Allow two big drives in three quarters against a team that rushes for like 170 yards a game? OK, I’ll take it. Again this is just not going to be perfect…the guys on the other side are really good too.

They could just roll over in the fourth and die. Who knows, LeFleur is very good at pressing weaknesses and adjusting in game.

The irony here is that they’re winning because of ball control offense and you’re too committed to your Caleb take to acknowledge as much.

You’re crediting the defense, which has been a sieve, when the only way to stop the packers offense today has been to keep them off the field.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.
Top
 Profile  
 
Seacrest
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 39226
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I can’t believe he didn’t take the field goal

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
Seacrest
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 39226
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I can’t believe he didn’t take the field goal

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:

You’re crediting the defense, which has been a sieve, when the only way to stop the packers offense today has been to keep them off the field.

I am giving credit to the defense for holding the 9th ranked scoring offense in the NFL to fourteen points into the fourth quarter. I don’t know what more you want.

Not everyone can look as good as the Patriots looked against Caleb Williams.


Last edited by USA on Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57410
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hopefully the Packers can get a safety here.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5485
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Dumb call.. but maybe they’re playing for field position pinning the Bears deep here



Brown needs to dial something up here and get off that goal line

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
The Doctor Of Style
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12983
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Worked out great for the Bears Dumb call by LaFleur. Kick the Field Goal

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Biggest pet peeve in the NFL over the last ten years is this ridiculous trend away from taking the points and treating every possession like its do-or-die. Glad it worked in the Bears favor.
Top
 Profile  
 
USA
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2733
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
There are practice squad quarterbacks who throw a touchdown there.
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Bears vs Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:28 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57410
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Even if the Packers come back, the heat is off Eberflus. They don't look like they're in open revolt anymore.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 15
  [ 422 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group