It is currently Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:03 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26422
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

Is Bernstein not allowed to raise money for One Step unless he’s on their Board?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94520
Location: To the left of my post
Douchebag wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.

"Don't cancel the cancelers" isn't the point. It's that everyone enjoys people they don't like having bad things happen to them. Some people cheered when Tucker Carlson got fired. Some people cheered when Joy Reid got fired. It doesn't make it right or wrong but the outrage on "free speech" or whatever other argument against it was simply because they didn't like it that time but liked it a different time.

I like when Tucker Carlson claimed to have the story of the century and then sent the only copy of the evidence in a UPS box and then it was lost.

:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2710
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
pittmike wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

You’re misunderstanding the metaphor.

The dick doesn’t have to be the one shat upon to fuck the asshole. The very existence of the asshole invites the dick into being.


Ricky does not get the nuance let him go on.


You emailed a cancer charity to remove someone from their board because of a twitter fight about a fish, you're a loser.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2710
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

Is Bernstein not allowed to raise money for One Step unless he’s on their Board?


I'm sure he will anyway, you don't need to pretend that he isn't the only reason anyone here knows about One Step.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33645
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Planned day off for Bernsie?

Edit: off all week.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Last edited by denisdman on Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39117
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. .

Lets see which one applies here. Lets go with " those guys are just doing a bit". There, all better now.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25205
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 31044
Bernsie ain’t going to blow you Ricky

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26422
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

Is Bernstein not allowed to raise money for One Step unless he’s on their Board?


I'm sure he will anyway, you don't need to pretend that he isn't the only reason anyone here knows about One Step.

Who said otherwise?

You’re arguing (without evidence) that the charity will be adversely impacted because Bernstein no longer has a formal role with the organization.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39117
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE KIDS WITH CANCER!!!!

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2710
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
Hawg Ass wrote:
Bernsie ain’t going to blow you Ricky

buhhhhhh, I don't even like or listen to Bernstein, the one good thing he's always done was his cancer charity work but guess you dorks have to have your pound of flesh

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41236
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Ricky11Slade wrote:
pittmike wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

You’re misunderstanding the metaphor.

The dick doesn’t have to be the one shat upon to fuck the asshole. The very existence of the asshole invites the dick into being.


Ricky does not get the nuance let him go on.


You emailed a cancer charity to remove someone from their board because of a twitter fight about a fish, you're a loser.


He can still raise money for them.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33645
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hawg Ass wrote:
Bernsie ain’t going to blow you Ricky


But will he blow Parkins?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 31044
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Bernsie ain’t going to blow you Ricky

buhhhhhh, I don't even like or listen to Bernstein, the one good thing he's always done was his cancer charity work but guess you dorks have to have your pound of flesh

He can still do all the work for that cancer charity he wants, as a matter of fact, it looks like he has extra time on his hands.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39117
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
denisdman wrote:
Planned day off for Bernsie?

Edit: off all week.

GREAT SHOWS THIS WEEK !!

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2710
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Is Bernstein not allowed to raise money for One Step unless he’s on their Board?


I'm sure he will anyway, you don't need to pretend that he isn't the only reason anyone here knows about One Step.

Who said otherwise?

You’re arguing (without evidence) that the charity will be adversely impacted because Bernstein no longer has a formal role with the organization.


Maybe Bernstein was holding them back

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41236
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
badrogue17 wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Planned day off for Bernsie?

Edit: off all week.

GREAT SHOWS THIS WEEK !!


Yup

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23909
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

The hosting career went pretty well actually, I reached heights that the vast majority of people who start a show will never see. In that light aping [peak] Bernstein's style to find my footing and "narrative voice", if you will, went pretty well. The problem with believing much of what LTG says is that you end up looking pretty foolish when the words meet reality.

Continue your appeal to emotion to prevent Dan Bernstein from facing consequences, by all means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81465
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
KDdidit wrote:



What a terrible couple weeks for liberals. First the liberals in Congress refused to stand for a cancer kid. Now radio liberals are blasting a cancer charity for not respecting dan bernstein enough.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 34080
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
good dolphin wrote:
I don’t think the physical threat has gotten nearly enough attention in all of this.


There's no physical threat from Bernstein. :lol: He's no different from any other crazy white liberal woman. It's always okay to threaten any Trump supporter with whatever tool in the toolbox ie social canceling, get people fired, harassing them or family, physical etc. because liberals are just so good. They have the moral high ground and are better people. Anything they do is fine and anything they do to a conservative is fine because the conservative deserves it even if it's a troll. Maybe he'll release some half assed apology but you know he's seething on the inside. He lost his place with his charity but it's only because he's such a good person. He cares too much and was justified with trying to put the troll in his place. He'll hate them even more. This really puts a damper on the it's all an act mantra. It's a total psycho move to mention kids. Lots have been cancelled or fire for less. McNeil was and Bernstein (yes I called him Bernstein) danced all over that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94520
Location: To the left of my post
Ricky, try making fun of JLN because he golfs. That one works better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2861
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
billypootons wrote:


damaneel giving interesting tidbits in the replies


Exactly my take, and therefore correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2710
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

The hosting career went pretty well actually, I reached heights that the vast majority of people who start a show will never see. In that light aping [peak] Bernstein's style to find my footing and "narrative voice", if you will, went pretty well. The problem with believing much of what LTG says is that you end up looking pretty foolish when the words meet reality.

Continue your appeal to emotion to prevent Dan Bernstein from facing consequences, by all means.


congrats on your retirement from podcasting!

I'm not appealing to emotion dipshit, but I guess you do actually love cancel culture as much as Dan Bernstein. The aping hasn't really stopped.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23909
pizza_Place: Giordano's
good dolphin wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
NGL, I hope Bernstein survives this because otherwise a large group of people here will suddenly be the dog who finally caught up to the car they're chasing.

Also, people shouldn't be rooting for Audacy to fire what few people are still left in the building. It might be a deathblow to the Score.

I don't know that Bernstein has earned the free pass of "but wut about stalwart analog radio hosts?!?!?" Either being a horrible douche threatening to involve someone's kids is worth being held accountable or it's not, and Dan has championed for Mariano's floor workers to be fired for a whole helluva lot less. He's got his money, now it's time to experience a fraction of the "professional" strife he deserves for coasting on the misery of others for decades. At worst he'll have to move some money from his trust fund to pay for the ritzy colleges his cumstains attend while he maintains his life in one of the richest parts of the richest cities on the planet. Let's all shed a tear for Dan Bernstein.


I can't remember if you were a guy who railed against cancel culture.

I think I'm on the record that my personal preference is no cancelling, but I'm fine with cancelling being the standard so long as it is THE standard, applied equally to everyone, everywhere. What I certainly find outrageous is the people ironically like Dan Bernstein who claim that they're not cancelling you while they berate your employer to fire you, and then claim "cancel culture" is a fiction concocted by conservatives.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81465
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Reared on the Score wrote:
billypootons wrote:


damaneel giving interesting tidbits in the replies


Exactly my take, and therefore correct.



I'm gonna sic my sycophants on your home address (where your kids live). Do you want that? By the way, I'm not threatening your kids. Mac and an Internet personality named "Reared on the Score" say so.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2861
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.


That's right. Also 'that side' has made their entire personality being not only becoming an asshole loser upset about everything, but proud of it

So it's consistent that they are the most upset at others claiming not to be assholes, but they can't claim themselves to not be assholes. Don't crap me now, nonono


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83488
billypootons wrote:


damaneel giving interesting tidbits in the replies


his logic is completely convoluted.

Mac has to be reading. Hi, Mac. Get in here for a St. Patrick's Day visit.

Don't simp for Bernstein. I know you've done the 12 step forgiveness thing but that guy congratulated his bosses for firing you. He's a sniveling coward unworthy of your help

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25205
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
JORR wrote:
KDdidit wrote:



What a terrible couple weeks for liberals. First the liberals in Congress refused to stand for a cancer kid. Now radio liberals are blasting a cancer charity for not respecting dan bernstein enough.


Not as terrible a week as the kids with cancer had.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23909
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ricky11Slade wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
This “don’t cancel the cancelers” line of thought is the latest iteration of the unilateral disarmament argument, wherein one is expected to act in line with certain principles while another is given free reign to be an asshole.

Can’t work that way. The anti-canceler has to be allowed the ability to use the canceler’s rules against him. That’s how society works; otherwise you’re forcing the anti-canceler into being a perma-pussy.

Does that make the anti-canceler a dick? Maybe. But dicks fuck assholes.


none of the losers on this board cheering about getting Bernstein removed from a children's cancer charity have been cancelled. They're just being assholes, like Bernstein. The difference here is Bernstein is the only one with skin in the game. The middle aged men here excitedly posting about how they won a battle have maybe impacted a charity's ability to raise money and made Dan Bernstein feel bad. Congrats to them, they're big time losers.

:lol: Don't worry Dan, I'll shield your honor with these childhood cancer patients, that'll do the trick!

You're a fucking genius.


how's that radio/podcast career going? aping Bernstein didn't go so well did it?

There's no honor involved in any of this, but again, the huge losers here are celebrating, at best, adversely affecting a cancer charity's ability to raise money.

The hosting career went pretty well actually, I reached heights that the vast majority of people who start a show will never see. In that light aping [peak] Bernstein's style to find my footing and "narrative voice", if you will, went pretty well. The problem with believing much of what LTG says is that you end up looking pretty foolish when the words meet reality.

Continue your appeal to emotion to prevent Dan Bernstein from facing consequences, by all means.


congrats on your retirement from podcasting!

I'm not appealing to emotion dipshit, but I guess you do actually love cancel culture as much as Dan Bernstein. The aping hasn't really stopped.

"All you people wanting consequences for Dan Bernstein have done is hurt a charity's ability to raise money for kids with cancer" is a pretty big appeal to emotion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19798
Probably doesn't deserve to be fired. However, this is the type of thing he has not had a problem going after others for. Didn't he applaud the score when the fired McNeil for making the tough decision?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group