It is currently Tue Apr 29, 2025 11:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 522
Location: NY
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
woops meant the pistons there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
For as much as we hate Vinny, remember that Jay Triano is almost as bad, if not as bad. I agree with DB though. Just plain stupid on Vinny's part. God, he's in an idiot.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Is Noah a top 5 center in the East?

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
Is Noah a top 5 center in the East?


Is there any question? I'm not counting Lee cuz there's no way he's a real C. I'd have no problem putting Noah above Lopez or Horford, those three are all very similar. I think Bogut firmly put himself in the 2nd spot before he went down.

Dwight Howard



Andrew Bogut
Brook Lopez
Noah
Al Horford

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32282
pizza_Place: Milano's
you're putting Noah above Horford? :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
you're putting Noah above Horford? :x


I think they are interchangable honestly. Horford seems like he's developing too much Brand-syndrome. Has he really progressed like he should have the last 3 years? I think Noah will have the better career. Maybe Mike Woodson shouldnt be number 14 or whatever I had him ranked.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 44142
FavreFan wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Horford seems like he's developing too much Brand-syndrome.

Horford hates black people?

:shock:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32282
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
Bagels wrote:
you're putting Noah above Horford? :x


I think they are interchangable honestly. Horford seems like he's developing too much Brand-syndrome. Has he really progressed like he should have the last 3 years? I think Noah will have the better career. Maybe Mike Woodson shouldnt be number 14 or whatever I had him ranked.


how should he have progressed? what do you feel he should be doing now?

let's compare for this year
HORFORD: 14.2 PPG, 9.8 RPG, 1.11 BPG, 0.74 SPG, .552 FG, .787 FT
NOAH: 10.6 PPG, 10.9 RPG, 1.55 BPG, 0.52 SPG, .502 FG, .754 FT

so he's grabbing almost as many rebounds while scoring more on better shooting overall.

i think Horford probably could be a 20ppg scorer, but bear in mind he's playing w/ Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Crawford...he's not going to be the 1st option. 55% FG shooting is pretty good even for a center/PF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 44142
Bagels wrote:
let's compare for this year
HORFORD: 14.2 PPG, 9.8 RPG, 1.11 BPG, 0.74 SPG, .552 FG, .787 FT
NOAH: 10.6 PPG, 10.9 RPG, 1.55 BPG, 0.52 SPG, .502 FG, .754 FT

Noah's number are a little skewed because he spent about 1-2 months of this season only playing 10-20 minutes a game. His numbers were a little better before the injury. I think he was averaging somewhere around 12 points/12 Rebounds a game before he was sidetracked.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 522
Location: NY
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
he was almost exactly at 12 per before the injury. 11.8 for both rebounds and points


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I also look at things like the Bulls going 0-10 without Noah, then 9-4 when he got back.

Horford is definitely better offensively, but I think Noah gives you more intangibles and defense. I think he's definitely a better rebounder.

What I meant by Brand syndrome is that statistically, he's not much better than his rookie year

10 ppg, 9.7 rpg, .9 bpg, 49FG%
11.5 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 1.4 bpg, 52FG%
14.2 ppg, 9.8 rpg, 1.1 bpg, 55FG%

Based on those rookie numbers, I just thought he'd be doing better by now. You make a good point about him having a much better surrounding team, I just thought he would be great by now his rookie year. I dont think he's a great player. Noah might not ever be great, but I think it stands to reason that you can expect better, more rapid progression from him considering his jump from last year, to last years playoffs, and now this year. He's becoming a leader on the team, which I think is an important intangible that not many bigs have.

Like I said, right now I consider them roughly the same. I expect Noah to be the better player 4 years from now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32282
pizza_Place: Milano's
i will say this- i think noah has hit his peak. i think getting 12/12 from him (or however you want to say the numbers, it's close to this +/- a bit) is it. not at all saying that's bad...it's pretty good

i think horford can still fine tune his offensive moves. like i said i think he can be a 20ppg scorer. he does actually have post moves, where Noah doesn't. i think horford struggles when he tries to back down people ala Barkey or something....he's not that dominant. when he makes his move quickly, he has a lot of success


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Noah's shot might be ugly as hell but it's improving. His overall offensive game has improved, most notably his passing. And I dont think it's out of the question for him to put up a 15-13 season in the next few years. I'm positive he has the drive to get better. As dramatically as he's increased in the last 12 months, I'm surprised you think he's all of a sudden hit his peak.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32282
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
As dramatically as he's increased in the last 12 months, I'm surprised you think he's all of a sudden hit his peak.


...he's doing pretty good...I mean do you think he could average 20-10? just asking. I think Horford can. I at least see some promise in his post moves and his offensive moves in general. Even if he's not there yet, I can see where he's headed. I don't see that with Noah. I think he could be a better rebounder than Horford just because that's likely his niche, but I think even if his offensive game is refined more, it's still not going to be any better than average.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 44142
Bagels wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
As dramatically as he's increased in the last 12 months, I'm surprised you think he's all of a sudden hit his peak.


...he's doing pretty good...I mean do you think he could average 20-10? just asking. I think Horford can. I at least see some promise in his post moves and his offensive moves in general. Even if he's not there yet, I can see where he's headed. I don't see that with Noah. I think he could be a better rebounder than Horford just because that's likely his niche, but I think even if his offensive game is refined more, it's still not going to be any better than average.

I could agree with that. Noah's ceiling is probably somewhere around 12-14 PPG.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bulls v. Nets
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
As dramatically as he's increased in the last 12 months, I'm surprised you think he's all of a sudden hit his peak.


...he's doing pretty good...I mean do you think he could average 20-10? just asking. I think Horford can. I at least see some promise in his post moves and his offensive moves in general. Even if he's not there yet, I can see where he's headed. I don't see that with Noah. I think he could be a better rebounder than Horford just because that's likely his niche, but I think even if his offensive game is refined more, it's still not going to be any better than average.


Noah isnt the 20-10 type of guy. Randolph is, but there's no question in my mind Noah is the better player. I think, barring injury, Noah's prime will consist of 14-13 type seasons with about 2 blocks. His impact wont just be measurable by statistics though. I have a feeling he's the type of guy that will play on alot of winning teams in his career.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group